Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures
Adds comment in paragraphs 11, 12 from funding advocate
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -More than 100 major companies from the technology, pharmaceutical, automotive and other sectors have urged the U.S. judiciary to adopt a nationwide rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding in lawsuits.
Companies including Amazon.com, Google, Cisco, Meta, Comcast, Exxon, Zurich, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Ford, Pfizer and Novartis submitted the letter on Wednesday to the federal courts’ Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, in advance of a hearing by the committee next week.
Litigation funding, where a financier backs clients' cases in exchange for a cut of an eventual settlement or judgment, has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years.
Some U.S. courts require disclosure of outside funding, but there is no uniformity across the judiciary.
The companies either had no immediate comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter, which was organized by defense-focused Lawyers for Civil Justice.
Some of the signatories have previously expressed concern about litigation funding and the need for greater oversight. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups have for years called on standardizing funding disclosure rules.
The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform submitted a letter on Wednesday to the advisory committee urging greater oversight, and Republican U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis expressed a similar view.
The companies’ letter said disclosures about financial backers in cases are necessary to allow defendants to make informed decisions about the course of litigation. They said outside funding “fundamentally alters the dynamics and has a major impact on whether the dispute can be resolved through settlement.”
Christopher Bogart, chief executive of litigation funder Burford Capital, in a statement on Thursday questioned the motives of the companies that signed onto the letter and rejected their call for mandatory disclosures.
"What they want is to keep their unfair advantage in the justice system and to drive up costs for anyone who sues them – which is exactly what they do whenever they find out about the identity of a litigation funder,” Bogart said.
The International Legal Finance Association, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for the funding industry, in a statement on Thursday criticized the drive for a nationwide disclosure rule.
"These companies yet again are attempting to further tilt the justice system in their own favor by forcing their challengers to disclose privileged information about their legal strategies," Shannon Campagna, the group's acting executive director, said.
The judiciary's civil rules advisory committee is meeting on Oct. 10 in Washington, D.C. The panel said its agenda includes a discussion of amending court rules to require disclosure of litigation funding. No formal proposal is up for a vote.
A representative for the committee declined to comment.
The committee last discussed litigation funding in late 2021.
Read more:
Louisiana law places new rules on litigation funders
Litigation funder Burford fights order denying bid to take over Sysco cases
US litigation funding in 'state of flux' as deal commitments dip, says report
Litigation funders deployed $3.2 bln in U.S. investments last year - report
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
