Legal Fee Tracker: Law firms line up in Baltimore bridge collapse cases
By David Thomas and Mike Scarcella
Sept 26 (Reuters) -Litigation over the catastrophic collapse of Baltimore's Francis Scott Key Bridge has begun in earnest, after the state of Maryland, the U.S. Justice Department, victims' families and others lodged new civil claims against the owner and operator of the cargo ship that struck the bridge in March 2024.
Billions of dollars are on the line for taxpayers and for ship owner Grace Ocean Pte Ltd and operator Synergy Marine Group in the Maryland case alone. Lawyers have a stake too, of course: Contract disclosures by Maryland state agencies show how private contingency fee lawyers could secure more than a hundred million dollars if the state achieves a major recovery.
Maryland tapped Mark Lanier's Lanier Law Firm, Kelley Drye & Warren, Gulf Coast firm Liskow & Lewis, Partridge LLC, and local counsel Downs Ward Bender Herzog & Kintigh for its case, which alleges that the disaster was preventable and that Grace Ocean and Synergy are liable.
Maryland's fee agreement grants the law firms a percentage of any recovery that is based on the size and timing of a settlement or judgment, and is structured so that they would receive a smaller proportion as the amount increases.
For example, a hypothetical $500 million settlement on the eve of trial would put the lawyers in line to receive $83 million, or 16.6% of the amount. If the state wins $1 billion, the lawyers would get $143 million, or 14.3%. A $2 billion recovery would yield a 8.15% share, or $163 million. The state did not disclose any cap on the fees outside counsel can receive.
An expected $350 million insurance payment from Chubb, the bridge's insurer, would not figure into the fees and is excluded from the calculations.
"These firms are providing assistance to the OAG litigation team, and we will devote as many lawyers as necessary to effectively pursue the state’s claims in this litigation that is of such critical importance to Marylanders," Maryland attorney general spokesperson Jennifer Donelan said in a statement on Thursday.
Lanier did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Attorneys at Kelley Drye, Liskow, Partridge, and Downs Ward declined to comment.
Lawyers for Grace Ocean and Synergy Marine at law firms Duane Morris and Blank Rome did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Maryland's claim does not specify damages, but the state has estimated that it will cost $1.7 billion to repair the bridge, and said the disaster harmed its ability to collect hundreds of millions of dollars in tax and toll revenue. The collapse has forced drivers to go elsewhere, increasing the wear and tear on those roads, the state said.
The city of Baltimore has also sued the companies, and said the nearby port generated more than $70 billion in economic value in 2023 alone. The city hired two law firms, DiCello Levitt and Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky to press its claims.
Baltimore city’s legal department declined to release the city’s contract with its outside firms, saying the information was shielded from disclosure under public records law.
Baltimore County separately hired Grant & Eisenhofer and Bekman Marder Hopper Malarkey & Perlin to pursue its claims against Grace Ocean and Synergy Marine, filed on Tuesday. The county and the firms did not respond to requests for comment about their fee agreements.
The cases are pending in Maryland federal court. The Justice Department is seeking $103 million from Grace Ocean and Synergy to recover the costs of clearing the wreck of the Dali and bridge debris from the Port of Baltimore so the waterway could reopen in June.
All of the claimants face a key obstacle to winning significant damages. Citing federal maritime law, Grace Ocean and Synergy petitioned the court in April to limit their liability from the crash to the present value of the ship and its cargo, which they estimated to be just over $43 million.
- In other legal fee news, a New York lawyer who sued Dutch airline KLM for allegedly misleading customers about its environmental pledges was fined and ordered to pay legal fees after a judge found he pressed ahead with the case despite knowing his client's claims were false.
- Oracle ORCL.N is entitled to more than $58.5 million in attorneys' fees and costs from rival Rimini Street RMNI.O in their long-running copyright dispute over Rimini's alleged theft of Oracle software, a Nevada federal court said on Monday.
(Legal Fee Tracker is a weekly feature exploring attorney compensation awards and disputes in class actions, bankruptcies and other matters. Please send tips or suggestions to D.Thomas@thomsonreuters.com.)
Read More:
Legal Fee Tracker: Google, privacy lawyers clash over $217 million fee bid
Legal Fee Tracker: Clearview AI's choose-your-own-adventure privacy settlement
Legal Fee Tracker: Giuliani's bill for Trump work could go to Georgia poll workers
Reporting by David Thomas
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
