Litigation funder backs cases over NJ law shielding info on judges, officials
By Nate Raymond
Oct 11 (Reuters) -A data-deletion firm that has sued over 100 businesses accusing themof running afoul of a New Jersey law designed to shield the release of addresses and other personal information of judges, police and prosecutors is being backed by a third-party litigation funder, according to court papers.
Atlas Data Privacy, a software firm that has been assigned claims by over 19,000 people eligible for protection under the law, disclosed it expected to soon deploy funding provided by Parabellum Capital in a Thursdayfiling in New Jersey federal court.
The New York-based litigation funder, which has over $1 billion in assets under management, spun out of Credit Suisse in 2012 and provides third-party funding to litigants in commercial disputes in exchange for a share of any recovery.
In January, it said it closed on its third private fund with total investor commitments of $754 million.
Often funding arrangements between plaintiffs and third-party litigation funders go undisclosed. But New Jersey's federal court in 2021 adopted a unique rule requiring litigants to detail when they have such funding.
Atlas said that it was receiving non-resource financing that would be "collateralized by litigation proceeds." It did not provide details on the financial terms of the arrangement.
Parabellum CEO Howard Shams had no immediate comment. Atlas' lawyers at PEM Law, Boies Schiller Flexner and Morgan & Morgan did not respond to requests for comment.
The disclosure came a week after various companies sued by Atlas went before U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle in Camden to argue that its lawsuits should be dismissed on the grounds that the New Jersey law knownas Daniel's Law violated the companies' free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
The measure was signed into law in 2020 by Democratic Governor Phil Murphy in response to the fatal shooting of the 20-year-old son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas at her New Jersey home by a disgruntled lawyer.
The law, which has since been expanded, allows current and former judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, and other officials to request that private entities not disclose their home addresses or unpublished home phone numbers.
Companies that do not comply with an official's request to not disclose their information can be sued for damages.
A similar federal law named after Salas' son, the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, was enacted by Congress in late 2022 and protects judges by shielding their personal information online.
Atlas launched a wave of lawsuits earlier this year on behalf of individuals covered by the law against real estate businesses, marketing companies, data brokers and credit reporting agencies. Defendants include CoStar Group, Oracle Corp, Zillow and Thomson Reuters, Reuters' parent company.
Thomson Reuters in a statement said it was aware of the litigation funding but was focused on addressing the merits of the case. It said Daniel's Law "attempts to serve a laudable goal" but in its current form violates the First Amendment.
Individuals who assigned claims to Atlas to pursue in court stand to receive 65% of any judgment it recovers, according to a court filing filed on Thursday. It has contingency-fee arrangements with its law firms, according to another filing.
The case is Atlas Data Privacy Corp v. LightBox Parent LP, et al, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 22-4105.
For Atlas Data Privacy Corp: Rajiv Parikh of PEM Law, Mark Mao of Boies Schiller Flexner and John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan
For LightBox, et al: Kevin McDonough of Latham & Watkins
For New Jersey: Daniel Vannella of the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General
Read more:
New Jersey defends privacy law shielding judges, prosecutors
US judicial panel to examine litigation finance disclosure
Litigation funders howl as N.J. adopts disclosure requirement
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
